首页> 外文OA文献 >Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) during spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a crossover trial
【2h】

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) during spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a crossover trial

机译:重症患者自发呼吸试验中的神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)或压力支持通气(PSV):一项交叉试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract\ud \ud Background\ud Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a proportional ventilatory mode that uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) to offer ventilatory assistance in proportion to patient effort. NAVA has been increasingly used for critically ill patients, but it has not been evaluated during spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). We designed a pilot trial to assess the feasibility of using NAVA during SBTs, and to compare the breathing pattern and patient-ventilator asynchrony of NAVA with Pressure Support (PSV) during SBTs.\ud \ud \ud Methods\ud We conducted a crossover trial in the ICU of a university hospital in Brazil and included mechanically ventilated patients considered ready to undergo an SBT on the day of the study. Patients underwent two SBTs in randomized order: 30 min in PSV of 5 cmH2O or NAVA titrated to generate equivalent peak airway pressure (Paw), with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. The ICU team, blinded to ventilatory mode, evaluated whether patients passed each SBT. We captured flow, Paw and electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) from the ventilator and used it to calculate respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), and EAdi. Detection of asynchrony events used waveform analysis and we calculated the asynchrony index as the number of asynchrony events divided by the number of neural cycles.\ud \ud \ud Results\ud We included 20 patients in the study. All patients passed the SBT in PSV, and three failed the SBT in NAVA. Five patients were reintubated and the extubation failure rate was 25% (95% CI 9–49%). Respiratory parameters were similar in the two modes: VT = 6.1 (5.5–6.5) mL/Kg in NAVA vs. 5.5 (4.8–6.1) mL/Kg in PSV (p = 0.076) and RR = 27 (17–30) rpm in NAVA vs. 26 (20–30) rpm in PSV, p = 0.55. NAVA reduced AI, with a median of 11.5% (4.2–19.7) compared to 24.3% (6.3–34.3) in PSV (p = 0.033).\ud \ud \ud Conclusions\ud NAVA reduces patient-ventilator asynchrony index and generates a respiratory pattern similar to PSV during SBTs. Patients considered ready for mechanical ventilation liberation may be submitted to an SBT in NAVA using the same objective criteria used for SBTs in PSV.\ud \ud \ud Trial registration\ud ClinicalTrials.gov (\ud NCT01337271\ud \ud ), registered April 12, 2011.
机译:摘要\ ud \ ud背景\ ud神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)是一种比例通气模式,利用隔膜的电活动(EAdi)根据患者的努力提供通气辅助。 NAVA已越来越多地用于重症患者,但尚未在自发呼吸试验(SBT)中进行评估。我们设计了一项试点试验,以评估在SBT期间使用NAVA的可行性,并比较SBT期间NAVA与压力支持(PSV)的呼吸模式和患者-呼吸机的异步性。\ ud \ ud \ ud方法\ ud在巴西的一家大学医院的ICU中进行了一项临床试验,研究对象包括在研究当天准备接受SBT的机械通气患者。患者以随机顺序接受了两次SBT:5分钟PSV 30 cmH2O或NAVA滴定以产生等效的气道峰值压力(Paw),呼气末正压为5 cmH2O。对通气模式不了解的ICU小组评估了患者是否通过了每个SBT。我们从呼吸机捕获流量,爪子和隔膜的电活动(EAdi),并用它来计算呼吸频率(RR),潮气量(VT)和EAdi。异步事件的检测使用波形分析,我们将异步指标计算为异步事件数除以神经周期数。\ ud \ ud \ ud结果\ ud我们纳入了20名患者。所有患者均在PSV中通过SBT,三名患者在NAVA中未通过SBT。 5例患者再次插管,拔管失败率为25%(95%CI 9–49%)。两种模式下的呼吸参数相似:NAVA中的VT = 6.1(5.5-6.5)mL / Kg vs PSV中的5.5(4.8-6.1)mL / Kg(p = 0.076)和RR = 27(17-30)rpm NAVA中的速度与PSV中的26(20-30)rpm相比,p = 0.55。 NAVA降低了AI,中位值为11.5%(4.2-19.7),而PSV为24.3%(6.3-34.3)(p = 0.033)。\ ud \ ud \ ud结论\ ud NAVA降低了患者-呼吸机异步指数并产生SBT期间类似于PSV的呼吸模式。可以考虑使用机械通气的患者可以使用与PSV中SBT相同的客观标准在NAVA中接受SBT。\ ud \ ud \ ud试验注册\ ud ClinicalTrials.gov(\ ud NCT01337271 \ ud \ ud),已注册2011年4月12日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号